Case Study

Price Discrimination, Competitive Harm, and Damages – Consumer Products

$680,000
Jury Verdict
Central District of California
U.S. Federal Court
Six-Day Trial
Tried to a Jury
1Overview

Dr. DeForest McDuff was engaged in a California antitrust matter involving L.A. International Corp. and Prestige Consumer Healthcare, Inc., the maker of Clear Eyes. The matter focused on claims of preferential pricing and violation of antitrust statutes, with Dr. McDuff providing economic analysis that supported the jury’s findings for the plaintiffs.

2The Challenge

Did preferential pricing cause measurable economic harm?

Dr. McDuff and his team were asked to evaluate whether the defendants’ pricing practices resulted in economic harm to the plaintiffs and to quantify related damages. The analysis involved application of sophisticated economic models and trial testimony to explain Dr. McDuff’s opinions to the jury in a clear and understandable way.

2Our Approach

Sophisticated models, explained in plain terms at trial

3The Outcome

A favorable verdict, and a damages award that survived appeal

Dr. McDuff’s team supplied detailed damages assessments and Dr. McDuff presented these findings through his expert testimony, assisting the jury in understanding complex market effects and economic injury. The team’s work helped secure a favorable jury verdict under both federal and state law, underpinning the outcome with robust economic analysis. The damages award was affirmed on appeal.

Case Experts
DeForest McDuff, Ph.D.
DeForest McDuff, Ph.D.
Managing Director

Facing a comparable economic damages matter? Our experts can help.

Rely on Trusted Economic Experts to Support Your Case

Partner with Insight Economics, the economic consulting firm that delivers clarity, credibility, and confidence when it matters most.