Impact

“You have an impressive command of the record and you were, simply put, excellent on the stand.”

Law Firm Partner, Washington DC

“I was impressed with the degree to which you dug into the facts, the detailed factual citations, and the clear writing.”

Law Firm Associate, Boston

“We appreciate how well-prepared, responsive and focused you were throughout the process. It went well, as expected.”

Law Firm Partner, Chicago

“It has truly been a pleasure working with you. You know what you’re doing, plus you’re good people who are pleasant to work with. A hat trick!”

Law Firm Partner, Silicon Valley

“DeForest performed flawlessly at deposition with little preparation.”

Law Firm Partner, Chicago

“Thanks again to you and your team for your excellent work. Looking forward to the next one!”

Law Firm Partner, Silicon Valley

“DeForest was the first person I called. And he and his team did not disappoint.”

Law Firm Partner, Chicago

“Just a note to say what a pleasure it was to work with [DeForest] and Ryan. Your analysis was spot on and your team’s efficiency made our lives a lot easier when we had dozens of balls in the air.”

Law Firm Partner, Wisconsin

“DeForest McDuff and his team at Insight are without question one of the “go to” consultants I turn to when I have a critical case.”

Law Firm Partner, Chicago

“You’re a rockster— Thank you SO MUCH for all of your hard and great work and flexibility.”

Law Firm Counsel, Miami

“[Party] has demonstrated irreparable injury… Loss of goodwill and market share destroys [Party’s] relationships with its end-use customers that have been developed over decades…”

US Court of International Trade

“The Court notes… that [defendant] has made a substantial showing that the nexus between the commercial success and the [patent] is tenuous at best… ”

District Court of New Jersey

“Dr. McDuff testifies that Patent Owner’s asserted evidence… does not represent a strong case… Again, we credit Dr. McDuff’s opinions… ”

USPTO PTAB

“The Board found that [Party’s] commercial success evidence was ultimately “weak”… We reject [Party’s] challenge to the Board’s reasoning… ”

Federal Circuit

“At the outset, … [Party] does not challenge Dr. McDuff’s qualifications, which the Court finds are substantial.”

Central District of California

“…we do not agree that the [claimed benefits]… are attributable to the claimed method… we credit Dr. McDuff’s opinions, which stand unrebutted…”

USPTO PTAB

“In addition, the Court found Dr. McDuff’s testimony persuasive with respect to the “lack of nexus”…”

District of New Jersey

“We credit Dr. McDuff’s testimony and find… that Patent Owner’s insulin glargine patents may have precluded others from entering the market…”

USPTO PTAB

“…Dr. McDuff’s conclusions stem from his expertise in economic markets.”

Northern District of California

“The defendants offered unrebutted testimony from an expert in economics and pharmaceuticals…”

Federal Circuit