Impact

What clients say about Insight:

Below are excerpts of unsolicited feedback from our clients.

“You have an impressive command of the record and you were, simply put, excellent on the stand.”

Law Firm Partner, Washington DC

“I was impressed with the degree to which you dug into the facts, the detailed factual citations, and the clear writing.”

Law Firm Associate, Boston

“We appreciate how well-prepared, responsive and focused you were throughout the process. It went well, as expected.”

Law Firm Partner, Chicago

“It has truly been a pleasure working with you. You know what you’re doing, plus you’re good people who are pleasant to work with. A hat trick!”

Law Firm Partner, Silicon Valley

“DeForest performed flawlessly at deposition with little preparation.”

Law Firm Partner, Chicago

“Thanks again to you and your team for your excellent work. Looking forward to the next one!”

Law Firm Partner, Silicon Valley

“DeForest was the first person I called. And he and his team did not disappoint.”

Law Firm Partner, Chicago

“Just a note to say what a pleasure it was to work with [DeForest] and Ryan. Your analysis was spot on and your team’s efficiency made our lives a lot easier when we had dozens of balls in the air.”

Law Firm Partner, Wisconsin

“DeForest McDuff and his team at Insight are without question one of the “go to” consultants I turn to when I have a critical case.”

Law Firm Partner, Chicago

“You’re a rockster— Thank you SO MUCH for all of your hard and great work and flexibility.”

Law Firm Counsel, Miami

What courts say about Insight:

Below are excerpts from judicial opinions referencing our work.

“Dr. McDuff testifies that Patent Owner’s asserted evidence… does not represent a strong case… Again, we credit Dr. McDuff’s opinions… ”

USPTO PTAB

“At the outset, … [Party] does not challenge Dr. McDuff’s qualifications, which the Court finds are substantial.”

Central District of California

“…we do not agree that the [claimed benefits]… are attributable to the claimed method… we credit Dr. McDuff’s opinions, which stand unrebutted…”

USPTO PTAB

“In addition, the Court found Dr. McDuff’s testimony persuasive with respect to the “lack of nexus”…”

District of New Jersey

“We credit Dr. McDuff’s testimony and find… that Patent Owner’s insulin glargine patents may have precluded others from entering the market…”

USPTO PTAB

“…Dr. McDuff’s conclusions stem from his expertise in economic markets.”

Northern District of California

IAM Patent 1000 – Top Experts

From IAM: “The team at Insight Economics are excellent communicators and highly responsive; they have the ability to handle complex issues and come up with creative solutions.” Though a relatively young firm, Insight Economics packs a punch, thanks to the deep expertise of its testifiers and their commitment to providing top-notch client care.”

DeForest McDuff “garners praise for being “a fantastic testifier who is exceedingly skilled and whip smart… He really digs in to present credible, cogent analysis that moves the needle.”

Ryan Penkowski is “one of the best economic analysts and researchers out there. He possesses a deep knowledge of the relevant case law and is very thorough in his damages analysis. Ryan is particularly good at explaining complex economic principles to a lay audience.”
Read more about Insight Economics at the IAM Patent 1000